How Infections Trigger Inflammation and Lead to Bigger Problems in Your Dairy Herd

Inflammation is a natural defense mechanism against infection, but when prolonged or excessive, inflammation can have serious consequences, including metabolic disorders, reduced milk production, and financial losses. By understanding the link between infections, inflammation, and metabolic disorders, dairy farmers can take proactive steps to protect their herd’s health and productivity. This article explores how inflammation develops, its impact on metabolism, and key strategies for prevention.

How Inflammation Works

Inflammation is a cow's defense mechanism

When a cow’s reproductive tract becomes infected, often after calving, the immune system responds by triggering localized inflammation - a natural defense mechanism. Key pathogens like Escherichia coli, Trueperella pyogenes, and Fusobacterium necrophorum invade the reproductive tract, triggering an immune response that leads to localized inflammation(Sheldon et al., 2009; LeBlanc, 2008). While this initial reaction helps fight infection, these pathogens can persist, exacerbating inflammation and potentially leading to systemic effects. 

When inflammation becomes harmful: Systemic inflammation

While inflammation is necessary for fighting infection, it often becomes excessive and spread throughout the body, leading to systemic inflammation. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α are released into the bloodstream causing a cascade of immune and metabolic responses (Williams et al., 2008; Galvão et al., 2011).  

Systemic inflammation disrupts metabolism, causing further damage

Systemic inflammation imposes a heavy metabolic toll. Energy and nutrients that should support milk production or other physiological processes get redirected to sustain the immune response (Ingvartsen & Moyes, 2013). This redirection lead to serious metabolic disorders, including:

Metabolic Disorders Resulting from Systemic Inflammation

Ketosis

  • What Happens: Inflammatory cytokines reduce appetite, leading to a negative energy balance. Cows begin mobilizing body fat, which results in the production of ketone bodies—compounds the liver produces when breaking down fat for energy. While useful in small amounts, excessive buildup can become toxic, leading to reduced productivity and health issues such as weakened immunity and lower fertility (McArt et al., 2012; Sordillo & Raphael, 2013).

  • Impact: Up to 40% of fresh cows may develop ketosis within the first month post-calving. (Ospina et al., 2010)

  • Financial Cost: Ketosis treatment can cost up to $300 per cow, with milk losses of $50–$100 per case. 

Hypocalcemia (Low Blood Calcium)

  • What Happens: Inflammation interferes with normal calcium metabolism by disrupting parathyroid hormone signaling, impairing muscle functions and increasing the risk of secondary issues like retained placenta or displaced abomasum. (Chapinal et al., 2012; Martinez et al., 2012) 

  • Impact: -

  • Financial Cost:

    • Subclinical hypocalcemia can reduce milk production by 5-10% in affected cows (Reinhardt et al., 2011; Oetzel, 2013).
    • Each affected cow could lose $100–$200 in revenue per lactation due to reduced output.

Fatty Liver Syndrome

  • What Happens: The mobilization of excessive body fat due to inflammation exacerbates hepatic lipidosis, further impairing metabolic efficiency and immune function (Grummer, 2008; Sordillo et al., 2009).

  • Impact: Cows with fatty liver are more prone to illness, delayed conception, and reduced milk production.

  • Financial Cost: -

The Impact of Inflammation on Milk Production

Early Lactation

In the critical fresh period, systemic inflammation reduces dry matter intake (DMI), delaying peak milk production. This has a cascading effect on total lactation output (Overton & Waldron, 2004).

  • Impact: Cows with severe uterine inflammation produce 2–4 kg less milk per day during early lactation (Sheldon et al., 2006; Hammon et al., 2006).

Mid-Lactation

Ongoing inflammation diverts resources away from milk synthesis, reducing milk yield and compromising milk components such as protein and fat (Kessel et al., 2008; Moyes et al., 2014).

  • Impact: Persistent inflammation reduces mid-lactation productivity by 10-15%  

Late Lactation

Chronic inflammation affects milk quality, increasing somatic cell count (SCC) and bacterial contamination, reducing the commercial value of milk. Elevated SCC also impacts processing characteristics such as cheese yield and shelf life (Ruegg, 2017).

  • Impact: High SCC can lead to milk price penalties, ranging from $0.50 to $1.00 per 100 pounds in some markets (Bar et al., 2008).

Overall Costs of Inflammation to Your Farm

Reproductive tract infections and the resulting inflammation lead to major financial consequences:

  • Treatment Costs: Treating uterine infections, ketosis, and other metabolic disorders can cost $100-$500 per cow, depending on severity (Drackley, 1999; LeBlanc, 2010).

  • Loss of Milk Productivity & Revenue: Subclinical inflammation can lead to 500–1,000 kg of lost milk per lactation. With milk prices averaging $20 per 100 kg, this equates to $100-$200 in lost revenue per cow (Duffield et al., 2009; Sordillo, 2016).

  • Reduced Milk Quality: Inflammation-associated milk quality issues can lead to additional penalties and lost income, particularly in high-value markets (Ruegg, 2017).

  • Reduced Fertility and its Cost: Inflammation prolongs calving-to-conception intervals and increases the likelihood of culling due to reproductive failure. Each open day costs $2-$5 per cow (Lucy, 2001; Walsh et al., 2011).

Strategies to Protect Your Herd - Prevention is Key

Proactive steps can minimize the risk and impact of reproductive tract infections:

  1. Optimize Calving Environment

    • Provide clean, low-stress environments during and after calving to reduce infection risk. (LeBlanc et al., 2011)

    • Monitor transition cow health closely

  2. Nutritional Support

    • Offer balanced nutrition with adequate energy, protein, and minerals to support metabolic stability during the transition period.

  3. Early Detection

    • Monitor biomarkers like haptoglobin and NEFA levels to identify at-risk cows before problems escalate. (Pinedo et al., 2015; Trevisi & Minuti, 2018)

  4. Implement Preventive Solutions

    • Consider microbiome-targeting interventions like intravaginal probiotics to maintain reproductive tract health and prevent inflammation.

    • Maintaining a healthy reproductive tract microbiome is crucial for preventing infections and controlling inflammation (Machado et al., 2012; Gilbert et al., 2018).  

    • Solutions like FreshStart are specifically designed to help restore microbiome balance, mitigating inflammation during this critical period.


A Modern Approach to Reproductive Health

The evolution of dairy farming has brought new understanding about the importance of the reproductive tract microbiome. Just as we carefully manage rumen health through proper nutrition, maintaining a healthy reproductive tract microbiome is essential for optimal cow health 


Building a Sustainable Future

Modern dairy farming requires a proactive approach to reproductive health. Understanding the connection between reproductive tract infections and systemic inflammation helps farmers make informed decisions about herd health management. By implementing science-based preventive measures, you can protect both your herd's health and your operation's profitability.



 



References

  1. Ametaj, B. N., et al. (2014). Probiotics and their potential role in dairy cattle health and productivity. Animal Frontiers, 4(2), 30-36.

  2. Bar, D., Tauer, L. W., Bennett, G., et al. (2008). The cost of generic clinical mastitis in dairy cows as estimated by using dynamic programming. Journal of Dairy Science, 91(6), 2205-2214.

  3. Chapinal, N., Carson, M., Duffield, T. F., et al. (2012). The association of serum metabolites with clinical disease during the transition period. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(3), 1301-1309.

  4. De Vries, A. (2006). Economic value of pregnancy in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 89(10), 3876-3885.

  5. Drackley, J. K. (1999). Biology of dairy cows during the transition period: the final frontier? Journal of Dairy Science, 82(11), 2259-2273.

  6. Dubuc, J., et al. (2010). Risk factors for postpartum uterine diseases in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(12), 5764-5771.

  7. Duffield, T. F., Lissemore, K. D., McBride, B. W., et al. (2009). Impact of hyperketonemia in early lactation dairy cows on health and production. Journal of Dairy Science, 92(2), 571-580.

  8. Galvão, K. N., Greco, L. F., Vilela, J. M., et al. (2011). Effect of intrauterine infusion of ceftiofur on uterine health and fertility in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 94(3), 1325-1335.

  9. Gilbert, R. O., Santos, N. R., Galvão, K. N., et al. (2018). The microbiome’s role in transition cow health. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 34(2), 349-371.

  10. Grummer, R. R. (2008). Nutritional and management strategies for the prevention of fatty liver in dairy cattle. The Veterinary Journal, 176(1), 10-20.

  11. Ingvartsen, K. L., & Moyes, K. (2013). Nutrition, immune function and health of dairy cattle. Animal, 7(S1), 112-122.

  12. Kessel, S., Stöve, M., Meyer, H. H., et al. (2008). Individual variability in physiological adaptations to metabolic stress during early lactation in dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science, 86(8), 1969-1977.

  13. LeBlanc, S. J., Osawa, T., & Dubuc, J. (2011). Reproductive tract inflammatory disease in postpartum dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science, 123(3-4), 175-182.

  14. Lucy, M. C. (2001). Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end? Journal of Dairy Science, 84(6), 1277-1293.

  15. Martinez, N., Sinedino, L. D., & Bisinotto, R. S. (2012). Effects of oral calcium supplementation on reproductive performance in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(12), 7051-7065.

  16. Moyes, K. M., Larsen, T., Ingvartsen, K. L., et al. (2014). Cytokine production by blood monocytes: implications for early lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 97(11), 6932-6942.

  17. McArt, J. A. A., Nydam, D. V., & Oetzel, G. R. (2012). Epidemiology of subclinical ketosis in early lactation dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(9), 5056-5066.

  18. LeBlanc, S. J. (2008). Postpartum uterine disease and dairy herd reproductive performance: A review. The Veterinary Journal, 176(1), 102-114.

  19. Machado, V. S., Oikonomou, G., Bicalho, M. L., et al. (2012). Investigation of postpartum dairy cows’ uterine microbial diversity using metagenomic pyrosequencing. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(12), 7315-7326.

  20. Oetzel, G. R. (2013). Calcium supplementation in transition dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(9), 5699-5705.

  21. Ospina, P. A., Nydam, D. V., Stokol, T., et al. (2010). Association between the proportion of sampled transition cows with increased nonesterified fatty acids and β-hydroxybutyrate and disease incidence, pregnancy rate, and milk production at the herd level. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(8), 3595-3601.

  22. Overton, T. R., & Waldron, M. R. (2004). Nutritional management of transition dairy cows: strategies to optimize metabolic health. Journal of Dairy Science, 87(E. Suppl), E105-E119.

  23. Pascottini, O. B., et al. (2020). Subclinical endometritis and its impact on reproductive performance in dairy cows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 55(2), 140-148.

  24. Pinedo, P. J., De Vries, A., & Webb, D. W. (2015). Dynamics of culling risk with disposal codes reported by Dairy Herd Improvement dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(5), 2250-2261.

  25. Reinhardt, T. A., Lippolis, J. D., McCluskey, B. J., et al. (2011). Prevalence of subclinical hypocalcemia in dairy herds. The Veterinary Journal, 188(1), 122-124.

  26. Ruegg, P. L. (2017). A 100-year review: Mastitis detection, management, and prevention. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(12), 10381-10397.

  27. Sheldon, I. M., Lewis, G. S., LeBlanc, S., & Gilbert, R. O. (2006). Defining postpartum uterine disease in cattle. Theriogenology, 65(8), 1516-1530.

  28. Sordillo, L. M. (2016). Nutritional strategies to optimize dairy cattle immunity. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(6), 4967-4982.

  29. Sordillo, L. M., & Raphael, W. (2013). Significance of metabolic stress on immune function. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(6), 3684-3697.

  30. Trevisi, E., & Minuti, A. (2018). Assessment of the innate immune response in the periparturient cow. Research in Veterinary Science, 116, 47-54.

  31. Walsh, S. W., Williams, E. J., & Evans, A. C. O. (2011). A review of the causes of poor fertility in high milk producing dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science, 123(3-4), 127-138.

  32. Williams, E. J., Fischer, D. P., Pfeiffer, D. U., et al. (2008). Clinical evaluation of postpartum vaginal mucus reflects uterine bacterial infection and the immune response in cattle. Theriogenology, 69(5), 754-759.


 

 

Back to Our Blog